Malign history
Is history been correctly published?
It has been said in the past that history is written by the winners, it might be very true because we are starting, to learn that in many instances, what we were taught and what our children are being taught now is very different from what the “real” history is telling us.
Find out what your children might be learning that might be a lie.
Could it be true that allegedly the National Geographic publication has entered into an alleged deal the the Devil to smear and malign history in favor of publishing unproven drivel as if it has any place in print? For many people the idea that anyone would stoop to this kind of disgusting yellow journalism is something that is just depraved, and evil, (allegedly) If you feel that National Geographic has stepped over the line between fact and fiction and you believe that a boycott of the advertisers at National Geographic is in order please join us in developing a rejection to the lies and suggestive garbage of an article that was written by one By Patrick J. Kiger
10 Things You Probably Don’t Know About Benjamin Franklin
Many of the things presented in this article and in fact the series as a whole cannot be proven and are likely and allegedly fabricated, this is an injustice to the memory of one of the most respected men in our history.
The title should probably read, 10 things that we cannot prove and so we want to suggest that they might be true, well folks this is plain garbage and it is discomfiting.
source Franklin’s first career was in printing.
The American Museum of Natural History owns the printing press on which Franklin worked in the 1720s. Franklin was also America’s first postmaster general. British authorities named him postmaster of Philadelphia in 1737, and later promoted him to joint postmaster general for the Royal Post. During his tenure, Franklin cut colonial mail-delivery times in half.
But he was dismissed in 1774 for “revolutionary activities.” (Could it have been because post riders were spreading information about the colonial uprising?) A year later, the new Continental Congress restored him to the position of postmaster general; thereafter, Franklin returned his salary to Congress for the relief of wounded soldiers.
Tell me which article is more believable, which article is more trust worthy, just why did National Geographic allow this trash to be published in the first place? If you feel that National Geographic has stepped over the line with this trash, cancel your subscription. Let advertisers know that you do not support lies about our founding fathers being broadcast as if they were true.
Revision history has no place in society.
It should be dealt with in the way that all such myths have been debunked though the ages.
This day in history...
Powered By wordpress plugins
Related posts: